
An inescapable fact is that two objects cannot occupy the same space at the same time.
I could try to convince you of the opposite, weave a tale of string theory and the elasticity of the universe and the human mind, toss about words like nanoparticulate and Higgs Boson and Heidegger's Cat, show some cleavage, toss my hair, cover a chalkboard in difficult equations based on advanced calculus and graph-based illustrations in three and four dimensions using theories from the cutting edge of advanced super collider projects, tossed in with some SAT words like incalculable and a stern look of assumed superiority -- and you'd probably be convinced.
If the cleavage and the chalkboard and the graphs weren't enough, I'd give the entire presentation again, only in a miniskirt, and admit it: you'd follow the concept of an elastic band string theory that contradicted the basic laws of thermodynamics without hesitation, trust that I had been to Geneva, done my research, knew what was afoot in the deepest darkest circles of the dark matter loving, improbability loving, theory obsessed physicists.
If I claimed to be a member of a panel to change the law of thermodynamics to read
"it is rare but not unknown for two objects to occupy the same space at the same time,"
if I had a jaunty white monogrammed lab coat and a spiffy screen printed folder with the orbits of atoms and the shapes of subatomic particles neatly illustrated in a metallic holographic effect that changed depending on the angle of light which hit the folder
-- admit it, you'd subscribe to the popular press version of the scientific journal, peer reviewed as Contemporary International Theories and Observations on the Malleability of Thermodynamics then watered down and interspersed with glossy advertisements and reset in a larger, bolder typeface with wide margins and full color illustrations with the title WORLDWORKS! -- you'd subscribe to WORLDWORKS! after such a presentation even if your paid subscription didn't come with a holographic folder with images of the orbits of atoms and shapes of subatomic particles.
You'd have a quiet thrill of superiority whenever the over-designed quarterly WORLDWORKS! arrived in your mailbox, following the previous twelve weeks when you had sat, pored over the previous issue, with that lovely modern typesetting and so detailed illustrations that you almost allowed yourself to believe that you actually understood the articles, and the theories behind the articles, and the universe as depicted by late twentieth and early twenty-first century string theory and particle theory and engineering on a nano scale, even if the truth is that you've had problems getting through National Geographic's more technical articles and sometimes even Popular Mechanics seems a bit esoteric.
Even though WORLDWORKS! is there in a reassuring, science isn't for nerds, it's just for people who like a bit of a challenge, find daily life shallow and vapid, yearn for an understanding of the unseen everything way, even though WORLDWORKS! taunts with this promise, admit that you couldn't recreate any of the illustrations or discuss any of the theories with a teenager, much less the teenager's high school physics teacher, even if the teenager's high school physics teacher happens to primarily be the basketball coach.
You subscribed to WORLDWORKS! and got the holograph illustrated folder and sit down with strong coffee at your desk several times a month -- but honestly, secretly, you were happier when the laws of thermodynamics meant something, when science was understood not to change or to evolve, just to expand to admit further details about theories that made sense, were observable, didn't rely on math that was so esoteric and far-fetched that the answer wasn't any less complicated and superficially meaningless than the equation at the beginning. This talk of particles that can't be observed funded by projects whose costs are calculated in billions and billions of dollars isn't in the same comfortable line-up as the geometry and biology of your own school days, when Pluto was a planet and even little bitty far away concepts were rooted in reality.
Then WORLDWORKS! arrives, and the universe as something cohesive and comprehensible and once understood always known begins to slip between your fingers, replaced by an existential uncertainty that either the world really exists or that scientists have a clue or that the human mind -- yours in particular -- must be atrophying brain cells because all of this should make sense, but doesn't.
The subscription renewal card arrives in the mail, and you think, wow $125 for four issues, and is that science elastic string theory stuff even real, and what on earth is a subatomic particle, but there, on the dvd that came with the last issue, they go through the malleability of the universe facet by facet, explain supercolliders particle by particle, explore an otherwise unimaginable world, and feel like -- admit it -- you're seeing into god's own brain and becoming the person you could have developed into all those years ago, and the hope of that past identity is so strong, and the deep beauty of WORLDWORKS! so enticing, that you re-subscribe for another two years, eager for the follow up dvd promised sometime in the next eight issues.
Unfortunately, though, you'd stumbled into a project based performance art spectacle, staffed with artists who think that less money should be diverted to deep space exploration and lunar landings and superconducting supercolliders, and more money should go to education and healthcare and social justice, problems scientists only notice tangentially and from a point far, far away, and this art installation was set out specifically to demonstrate how easily average people, like politicians, don't have a clue what they're signing on for but can't bear to admit their ignorance, and so faced with nifty holographed folders and dvd's and illustrations and nice page layout, they are certain they understand each and every one of the facts.
The truth is that the artists created a random word generator using the top 100 buzz words from the scientific press, and press a button for the next word to use. Illustrations are montages from reputable journals altered with color filters and overlaid with Renaissance alchemy symbolism, and the text to accompany the graphics is chosen by rolling a dice and comparing the number rolled with the corresponding pages, paragraphs, and lines in a combination of reputable scientific peer reviewed journals and high school science textbooks and sometimes the Kabbalah or i-ching. The dvd was recorded by splicing together cable science television shows and You Tube clips and podcasts of science professors at Ivy League universities, with subtitles translated from early twentieth century German and French surrealist films and science fiction recorded shows from 1970s London archives.
A few graduate students and underemployed artists mastermind the entire production, from science presentation extravaganza to journal to dvd, and much of the production takes place under the influence of various conscious-altering substances. The grant money and subscription money pays not only for said substances and production costs, but sometimes also even covers studio rent.
Unfortunately, though, the laws of thermodynamics do hold true, and two objects cannot occupy the same space at the same time, string theory and nanoparticles be damned. That's why you're now avoided as the pseudo-scientific intellectual at cocktail parties and church events and even basketball games where the physics teacher is the head coach, because they all know that, and you don't have a clue what you're talking about.
Don't worry, though, the holographic imaged folder with the orbits of atoms and the shapes of subatomic particles is yours to keep, with your paid subscription to WORLDWORKS!
reading
fashion magazines, library books, high, middle, & low brow, and becoming rather bored of the can't-do-ness of it all
weather
Scotch, neat, two Advil, & a spare hand, please



